AC-262
guinea pig1 source
AC-262 has one rat pharmacology paper and a doping-detection study in horses. No human trial, no human pharmacokinetics, no safety profile beyond a rodent. If you want a SARM, ostarine has real clinical data. Running AC-262 is volunteering for an experiment nobody designed.
What it is
Acadia Pharmaceuticals screened this in the mid-2000s as part of the same partial-agonist SARM series that produced ACP-105. “Partial agonist” means it activates the androgen receptor more weakly than testosterone, enough to stimulate tissue but not enough to behave like a full androgen. One rat study tested that theory. No pharmaceutical company picked it up, no clinical program followed, and the only other published work is an equine metabolism study built for doping control.
What the research shows
One pharmacology paper in rats and one doping-detection study in horses. The rat work is the only receipt that matters:
Realistic protocols
I am not building a protocol out of one two-week rat study. Forum dosing runs 10 to 30 mg daily for six to eight weeks, but there is no human PK behind any of that. If you run it anyway: get a third-party COA on whatever you source, because a compound this obscure is an easy target for mislabeling. Suppression is the class rule, so have a PCT plan before you start. Bloodwork before and after, covering testosterone, lipids, and liver enzymes. Keep the cycle short and the dose low. Every SARM is WADA-prohibited if you compete.
Side effects
No human side-effect data exists. This is the SARM class profile and community reports:
Where to buy
No live listings from tracked vendors right now.